Glen's
Review of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of
the Ring
by Glen Oliver
December 19, 2001 -
[A Note from the Editor: This is one of two reviews
we're running on The Fellowship of the Ring. This review
is from Glen, who hasn't read The Lord of the Rings; the
other review is by KJB, who has read the books.]
I've never read J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings
books. My mom (and many people I know, for that matter)
was always a big fan of the novels and tried to hook me
on them for decades. I was interested in them, and was
even able to sense the appeal of them through Tolkien's
vast smokescreen of exposition and minutiae, but they
never "took". As such, when New Line announced its
daringly conceived, dangerously expensive cinematic
adaptation of the literary trilogy, I was profoundly
curious and interested but not rabidly excited to
see how it all turned out.
So, how does The Fellowship of the Ring (the first
installment of the movie trilogy) play-out for those not
strong enough to face The Tolkien Challenge head-on?
Pretty damn well. There have been many reviews implying
this is a perfect film it is not. Some reviews have
called it "the best film of the year" it probably is.
But, not to disparage Fellowship in any way, this
accolade must be considered in-context as 2001 is
among the worst movie years in the history of the medium
in many people's minds.
For all of its imperfections, FOTR deftly succeeds in a
few arenas in which other movies (if not all movies) of
this type have previously failed. A few very, very
important arenas. Director / co-screenwriter Peter
Jackson infuses Fellowship with a great deal of "real
world" edge and sensibility bringing humanity to
FOTR's characters, making its situations involving,
and...above all...legitimizing a genre which frequently
comes across as silly, distancing, gimmicky, and garish.
Jackson so effectively immerses us in his (remarkably
accessible) on-screen world that, on the few occasions
in which the film does slide towards expected genre
trappings and clichιs (like a character referring to
another character as "So-and-So, son of So-and-So"), the
moments seem incongruous and inorganic, and hit like a
clap of thunder.
Perennial girly-man Elijah Wood playing the besieged
and often-baffled Frodo Baggins (a very little person
charged with a very big undertaking) is pretty-much
upstaged by everyone and everything around him, but
that's the point of his character, so this isn't a
criticism, per se. Ian McKellen (as Gandalf) is
showstopping in both power and subtlety. While I doubt
it will happen, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he
received an Oscar nomination for this role. Liv Tyler
who has endured more than a few snotty digs in previous
reviews on this site conveys surprising intensity and
integrity during her brief appearance in Fellowship. And
then there's Christopher Lee.
Best known throughout the years as portrayer of villains
(like Dracula) in a variety of generally unrespectable
"B" movies (including the tragically awful Starship
Invasions, one of my guilty pleasures), Lee may finally
enter general public awareness in the coming year. Not
only does he have a significant role in the LOTR
trilogy, but you'll see him next summer as an
intergalactic super-badass named Count Dooku (aka "Lord
Tyranus") in Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the
Clones. The 79 year-old actor has been making movies for
(something like) forty-four years, and only now for
the first time will he be mass marketed as action
figures and miniature sculptures. That's gotta be at
least a little cool for him, no? Something of a triumph
for this underappreciated actor, and a welcomed
renaissance for a gentleman whose cult status has been
nearly mythological for decades, but has always glided
just beneath the mainstream's radar.
Fellowship does hit a few bumps along the way. A few of
the film's visual effects are not quite "there" yet.
Certain moments look a little too animated, a little too
artificial (check-out the falling domino effect of an
army being knocked down by an energy shockwave in the
movie's prologue it's kind of dopey). Some of FOTR's
creatures do not walk with a weight which suggests
they're actually interacting with the natural
encumbrance of gravity. We repetitively zoom through
numerous (FX-driven) establishing shots of sprawling
environments with a velocity not seen anywhere else in
the movie, using camera moves we've already seen
countless other times in countless other movies. Which
calls attention to the effects themselves, and forces us
to notice how they are being used. This is distracting.
And, unless my eyes deceive me, there is (at least) one
whopping continuity error in the film.
Fellowship's pacing is sometimes a bit off sometimes a
little redundant and meandering (you can only see little
people running around in the woods for so long before
the "fun" starts to dry-up). Often, such slow downs are
(presumably) a product of Tolkien's source material. But
it's important to remember that FOTR is, by its very
nature, an introduction to a remarkably vast story
which inherently requires a certain amount of
exposition, and the placement of sequences whose
meanings may not be fully understood or appreciated
until we've seen this film in context with its
successors.
At the end of the day, Jackson & Co. have manufactured
an oddly haunting film its qualities range from
lyrically beautiful to numbingly cacophonous. There's a
certain majesty to Fellowship of the Ring, but it's not
the majesty of stylish photography or elegant production
design. It's a majesty that can only be put on-screen by
filmmakers who truly feel the material with which they
are working...who truly believe in the task at
hand...who have a steady vision to fuel their endeavor.
All of the poetic writing and slick post-production in
the universe could not make up for the such genuine
qualities. Qualities which are fleeting to the point of
extinction in most large-scale productions these days.
Qualities which are evident here, in welcomed abundance.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
KJB's Review of The Lord of the Rings:
The Fellowship of the Ring
by KJB
December
19, 2001 - [A Note from the Editor: This is
one of two reviews we're running on The
Fellowship of the Ring. This review is by
KJB, who's read The Lord of the Rings; the
other review is from Glen, who hasn't read
the books.]
Historically, the realm of high fantasy has
taken a pounding when it comes to the big
screen. From films like Hawk the Slayer to
Krull to Dungeons & Dragons, the fantasy
genre has been virtually ignored by the
industry and critics alike. In fairness,
there haven't been a lot of good fantasy
films over the years. For every Ladyhawke
or Excalibur, there are three Deathstalker
or Beastmaster films. Even Harry Potter &
the Sorcerer's Stone, the film version of
the bestselling fantasy series, fell a
little short of the mark as a film. With
such a dubious history, it's no surprise
that it's taken this long for the
grand-daddy of all fantasy fiction, The Lord
of the Rings, to reach the big screen. It
was well worth the wait.
This is the second attempt to bring J.R.R.
Tolkien's fantasy trilogy to the big
screen. Director Ralph Bakshi adapted The
Fellowship of the Ring and the first half of
the second book, The Two Towers, in 1978
with mixed results. While that film is
generally disowned by the Tolkien fans, a
number of Bakshi's cinematic changes must
have made sense to Peter Jackson; many of
those changes have made it into the
live-action version.
A change that can be credited solely to
Jackson is the expansion of Christopher
Lee's role of the wizard Saruman. By
expanding what was a minor character in
Tolkien's trilogy into a major player,
Jackson puts a face on the evil force faced
by the protagonists instead of an undefined
darkness spreading from Mordor. A
well-produced prologue helps explain the
history of the One Ring with material
straight out of Tolkien's Silmarillion.
Informative without sounding like one of
those history movies from High School social
studies, the prologue is the introduction to
the world of Middle-earth for many members
of the audience and a perfect lead-in to the
story. While a lot of general wailing and
gnashing of teeth has been made of those
changes among the understandably wary
Tolkien fans, the changes help the film's
story flow for both those who have read the
trilogy and those who haven't while never
losing the spirit of the story.
Peter Jackson fills the screen with
fantastic images reminiscent of the best
fantasy paintings and doesn't let up for the
next two hours and forty-five minutes.
Unlike the fantasy films that have come
before it, The Fellowship of the Ring
manages to transport the viewer to a
different realm with no connection to the
"real" world. Every Hobbit, Elf and Orc look
believable, further transporting the
audience into Middle-earth. From the moment
Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen) enters the
Shire at the beginning of the film, the
outside world ceases to exist.
Sitting in the theater, I felt the same kind
of excitement and anticipation I felt the
first time I read the trilogy back in junior
high school. An extremely understanding
English teacher allowed me to read the Rings
trilogy and its companion novel, The Hobbit,
instead of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities as
part of an assignment. I'm sure she thought
it was an insane trade, reading four fairly
long novels instead of one but I was the one
who got the better part of the deal. I read
all four books within a week and a new world
opened up. Since that week, so many years
ago, I've had clearly defined images of the
world, the characters and the fantastic
creatures in my mind. In many cases,
Jackson's visuals not only met my
expectations but exceeded them.
Who could have imagined that New Zealand
could double for so many fantasy realms?
The forests of Lothlorien, the safety of
Rivendell and especially the Mines of Moria
come to life. It's the adventure inside
those mines, the basis for so many lost
hours of fantasy role-playing games for so
many people, that is the centerpiece of the
film. Frantic and exciting, this is one of
the best action sequences ever put to film.
The sequence adds to the epic feel of the
film. If the next two films come together
the way this one has, audiences are in for a
great triple feature in a few years.
If you're a die hard fan of the trilogy
looking for a direct translation of
Tolkien's works to the screen, you're going
to be disappointed. If you're looking for
easily the best fantasy film ever made, look
no further.
Source: http://movies.ign.com
|